GW Young America's Foundation

6:15- Opening remarks from GW YAF President Travis Korson; "First year of the Obama Administration is an epic failure." He has adopted the tactics of radical "community organizer" Saul Alinsky.

6:20- Columnist Donald Lambro discusses the "stimulus" package. It hasn't stimulated anything other than government, as it hasn't  created jobs and doesn't work. The unemployment reached just over 10 % contrary to the administration's predictions. The numbers being put out by the administration in terms of "saved jobs" are very suspect.  

The Federal Reserve forecasted that unemployment would hover between 9.3 and 9.7 percent through the end of this fiscal year. Economic growth at 1.2% through the end of the year, and therefore the jobless rate will remain high. This is evidence that the Obama stimulus is an "epic failure." Rather than help the economy, the stimuli add to our already unsustainable national debt. 

The Obama health care bill would destroy small business's due to large tax increases. The most recent Heritage Foundation/WSJ "Index of Economic Freedom" has shown that the U.S. has dropped in economic freedom due to more regulation of individuals, businesses, and higher taxes resulting in "less freedom." Lambro tells us, "We have a capital starved economy." We need more economic freedom, less regulation, lower taxes, which result in higher incentives and thus more capital.

Bottom line- "Government Stimulus Programs do not work." "Cut taxes, let people keep more of their money, and this will allow the economy to grow, which is a "systemic stimulus." 

6:45- Christopher Horner of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, best-selling author of Red Hot Lies. He is a leading critic of the environmentalist movement. 

Obama is pushing the "Green Agenda." Seeks to move energy choices from individuals to the State.  For the Green Movement, only "one side makes professional threats and assaults opponents, one side seeks to silence dissent, one side gets caught fudging data."

The Green Movement claims that "environmentalism goes hand-in-hand with traditional civil rights and social justice issues in our community."

Horner asks is "Van Jones Lying?" 

 Wants to transform society, from "suicidal gray capitalism to an eco-capitalism." Jones and NYT's Thomas Friedman are pining for enlightened totalitarianism like China as the only way to impose what's good for the masses to dumb to know it. 

Bottom Line- "Cap and Trade isn't about lowering global temperatures, it's about control." "It's an excuse to raise taxes."

7:00-National Review's Jonah Goldberg, also a LA Times columnist and a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. 

Cites Krauthammer and Mead's arguments that Obama is a radical at home and a centrist abroad and comes from the "Jeffersonian" tradition of foreign policy.

President Obama "pulled the rug out from under our allies in Europe" in terms of the missile defense shield.  Most telling response was his reaction to the Fort Hood shooting, he stated that it was an "isolated incident" rather than acknowledging the real threat of Islamic Fundamentalism. 

Bottom Line- Obama has fundamentalist Alinskyite tactics in terms of foreign policy. This is an administration that is concerned with the age old desire of Progressivism to assume control. 

7:21-Question and Answer Session:

What can Conservative due to get the word out and have the media pick up the story of the fraudulent nature of the environmentalist movement?

Horner: The media is not going to budge. The media are activists, it will be a lagging indicator after the masses. 

Goldberg: "Obama is part of the international Davos, Tom Friedman, UN crowd." Obama doesn't believe in American Exceptionalism, which is to say, he doesn't believe that America is the greatest force for good in the world.

What motivates the Jeffersonian thinker to disengage? 

Goldberg: Obama couldn't pull out of foreign engagements because it would be impossible politically?

Are we headed towards an economic situation like the stagflation of the 70s?

Lambro: Not necessarily because prices may not go up because consumer spending is not going up, and interest rates are low. However, it remains to be seen if the Fed can gradually pull back as Bernake says to quell inflation.

 7:40: Event concluded, thank you for coming out and hearing our panel!

Sam K. Theodosopoulos is the Editor-at-Large of the GW YAF Blog.

Barack Obama won the 2008 presidential election by “claiming to be a moderate and wanting to bring America together and govern from the center.” However, since day one of his administration, his actions can be characterized as far left rather than moderate.

 He has apologized to foreign dictators and autocrats abroad for the “sins of the United States,” appointed a self-described communist, 9/11 truther and “rowdy black nationalist” as his green jobs czar, taken over the automotive and banking industry, and has used the economic crisis to attempt to nationalize the health care system. David Horowitz reminds us in a short but important pamphlet; “These actions have already made his presidency one of the most polarizing in history.”

 As evidenced by the recent Republican victories in New Jersey, Virginia, and Massachusetts, many Americans have gone from “hopefulness, through unease, to a state of alarm,” as President Obama is proving to be a radical who only showed his true colors once reaching office.

 However, in order to analyze the Obama presidency, it is crucial to understand the nature of his political ideas and the people who have influenced him. Horowitz tells us that, Obama’s battle plan for “change” derives from the strategy of deception promoted by another radical community organizer, Saul Alinsky.

 Alinsky, a self-described “radical” and “rebel,” is the Sun Tzu for today’s radicals, and his manual Rules for Radicals remains the blueprint for aspiring progressive activists. In his work, he told readers that the radical is fundamentally a nihilist, and not a reformer of the system but its  “would-be destroyer.” In other words, Alinsky took to heart Goethe’s comment: “Everything that exists deserves to perish.”

 President Obama was influenced heavily by one of the most lessons from Alinsky’s manual, the need for deception. His advice was, “Even though you are at war with the system, don’t confront it as an opposing army; join it and undermine it as a fifth column from within.” In other words, it is first necessary to sell the people on change itself, or as Horowitz writes, the “audacity of hope,” and “yes we can.”

 The Alinsky model is one of destruction and nihilism all aimed at radical social change. His methods of deception as espoused in his influential manual, have certainly been largely adapted by the President Obama and his administration. We saw candidate Obama call for bi-partisanship and the need to govern from the center. However, upon reaching office he has shown his true colors as a far-left radical. His actions have not gone unnoticed as the pendulum is shifting towards the right in response to his deceit. 

To learn more about Obama, Alinsky and the failures of the Obama administration, join GWYAF this upcoming Wednesday, March 3rd at 6pm in Marvin Center 405 for our epic fail teach-in.  Details can be found here.

 Sam K. Theodosopoulos is the Editor-at-Large of the GWYAF Blog.